Field Studies and the Study of Power: Reflections from the Margins of the Indian Social Landscape

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54103/2612-6672/27741

Keywords:

Methodological Individualism, Methodological Holism, Power, Field-Based Research, India

Abstract

Starting from an acknowledgement of the inescapability of the question of the analytical-methodological space for the study of power, this paper presents a reflection upon an analytical-methodological principle that has increasingly informed the terrain of social sciences, namely methodological individualism, as it features in neoclassical economics. Contextually, by drawing upon the author’s research experience, the paper offers some reflections on the dialogue between theory and the field. It takes an analytical approach informed by methodological holism and which adopts the lens of critical political economy to interrogate the unfolding of specific social power dynamics. In so doing, the paper dwells upon the importance recognized, within such an approach, of individual life stories.

Author Biography

  • Matilde Adduci, University of Turin

    Research Fellow A

    History and Institutions of Asia

References

H. Veltmeyer, New Social Movements in Latin America: The dynamics of class and identity, in The Journal of Peasant Studies, No. 1, 1997, 143.

F. García-Quero, J. Ollero-Perán, Is Neoclassical Economics Scientific Knowledge Detached from Ethics? A Kantian Answer, an Institutionalist Alternative, in Review of Radical Political Economics, No. 1, 2015, 56–69

B. Ollman, What Is Political Science? What Should It Be?, in New Political Science, No. 4, 2000.

R. Swedberg, The New ‘Battle of Methods’, in Challenge, No. 1, 1990.

M. Adduci The Relentless de Facto Privatization Process of Chilika Lake, India, in Journ

Downloads

Published

2024-12-27

Issue

Section

Papers

How to Cite

Field Studies and the Study of Power: Reflections from the Margins of the Indian Social Landscape. (2024). Nuovi Autoritarismi E Democrazie: Diritto, Istituzioni, Società (NAD-DIS), 6(2). https://doi.org/10.54103/2612-6672/27741